People v. Morgan

194 A.D.2d 811, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1022
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Morgan. Read the opinion of the Court — 175 A.D.2d 930

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), rendered September 24, 1991, convicting him of rape in the first degree, rape in the third degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and sexual abuse in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, who was 25 years old at the time of the incident, was convicted of various charges of sexual misconduct involving a 14-year-old girl. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in precluding cross-examination of the victim concerning her prior sexual conduct (see, CPL 60.42; People v Crawford, 143 AD2d 141).

The defendant’s claims that remarks made by the prose[812]*812cutor in summation constituted error are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818) or do not warrant reversal of the judgment (see, People v Arce, 42 NY2d 179). Lawrence, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Morgan, 194 A.D.2d 811, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

194 A.D.2d 811 (People v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Arce
366 N.E.2d 279 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Nuccie
441 N.E.2d 1111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Crawford
143 A.D.2d 141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)