People v. Moreno (Timoteo)

69 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2020 NY Slip Op 51290(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 30, 2020
Docket2018-1086 K CR
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 69 Misc. 3d 136(A) (People v. Moreno (Timoteo)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Moreno (Timoteo), 69 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2020 NY Slip Op 51290(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Moreno (2020 NY Slip Op 51290(U)) [*1]

People v Moreno (Timoteo)
2020 NY Slip Op 51290(U) [69 Misc 3d 136(A)]
Decided on October 30, 2020
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on October 30, 2020
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., BERNICE D. SIEGAL, WAVNY TOUSSAINT, JJ
2018-1086 K CR

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Timoteo Moreno, Appellant.


Appellate Advocates (David L. Goodwin of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Caroline R. Donhauser of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Adam D. Perlmutter, J.), rendered April 9, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

ALIOTTA, P.J., SIEGAL and TOUSSAINT, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 30, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Moreno (Timoteo)
69 Misc. 3d 136(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2020 NY Slip Op 51290(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moreno-timoteo-nyappterm-2020.