People v. Molina
225 A.D.2d 635, 639 N.Y.2d 739, 639 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2132
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Molina. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 A.D.2d 453 →
Opinion
The record is insufficient to determine whether the defendant’s written waiver of the right to appeal was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily executed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283). Nevertheless, we have examined the defendant’s contention that the sentences were excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Copertino, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Molina, 225 A.D.2d 635, 639 N.Y.2d 739, 639 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 635 (People v. Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)