People v. Molina
219 A.D.2d 687, 631 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9868
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Molina. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 A.D.2d 772 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 18, 1995·Published
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), imposed October 20, 1993.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant, that his sentence is excessive, was effectively waived by him as part of his plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, it is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Copertino, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Molina, 219 A.D.2d 687, 631 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
219 A.D.2d 687 (People v. Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)