People v. Mojica

205 A.D.2d 645, 613 N.Y.S.2d 411
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mojica. Read the opinion of the Court — 197 A.D.2d 642

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), rendered August 3, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to give the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea.

As part of a plea agreement, the court improperly agreed to place the defendant on interim probation by postponing his sentence to allow him to enter a drug treatment program, and promising him that it would vacate his guilty plea if he successfully completed the program (see, People v Rodney E., 77 NY2d 672; People v Johnson, 197 AD2d 638; People v Rodriguez, 202 AD2d 698). Accordingly, the defendant must be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mojica, 205 A.D.2d 645, 613 N.Y.S.2d 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 645 (People v. Mojica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodney E.
572 N.E.2d 603 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Johnson
197 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Rodriguez
202 A.D.2d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)