People v. Mojica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mojica

197 A.D.2d 642, 604 N.Y.S.2d 768

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), imposed May 8, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal should not be enforced with respect to the enhanced sentence he received as a consequence of his failure to appear for sentencing following his plea of guilty (see, People v Prescott, 196 AD2d 599). The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive under the circumstances (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence, O’Brien and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), imposed May 8, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal should not be enforced with respect to the enhanced sentence he received as a consequence of his failure to appear for sentencing following his plea of guilty (see, People v Prescott, 196 AD2d 599). The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive under the circumstances (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence, O’Brien and Joy, JJ., concur.

People v. Mojica, 197 A.D.2d 642, 604 N.Y.S.2d 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

197 A.D.2d 642 (People v. Mojica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related