People v. Aviles

207 A.D.2d 498, 616 N.Y.S.2d 243
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Aviles. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 A.D.2d 584

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), imposed November 4, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal should not be enforced with respect to the enhanced sentence that the defendant received as a consequence of his failure to appear for sentencing following his plea of guilty (see, People v Mojica, 197 AD2d 642; People v Prescott, 196 AD2d 599). We find the sentence that was imposed is not unduly harsh or excessive under the circumstances of this case (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Aviles, 207 A.D.2d 498, 616 N.Y.S.2d 243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 498 (People v. Aviles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Delgado
80 N.Y.2d 780 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Prescott
196 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Mojica
197 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)