People v. Moise

220 A.D.2d 536, 632 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9940
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Moise. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 A.D.2d 423

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), all rendered February 10, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts; one as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Moise, 220 A.D.2d 536, 632 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 536 (People v. Moise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)