People v. Moise
209 A.D.2d 726, 619 N.Y.S.2d 947
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Moise. Read the opinion of the Court — 199 A.D.2d 423 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 1994·Published
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed January 14, 1994.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Having pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence actually imposed, the defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentence was unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Moise, 209 A.D.2d 726, 619 N.Y.S.2d 947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).
209 A.D.2d 726 (People v. Moise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)