People v. Mochrie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mochrie

276 A.D.2d 831, 714 N.Y.S.2d 702, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10448

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 831 (People v. Mochrie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mochrie, 276 A.D.2d 831, 714 N.Y.S.2d 702, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett, III, J.), rendered July 29, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

The record demonstrates that, pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree in satisfaction of, inter alia, a 13-count indictment and was sentenced to a term of IV2 to 3 years in prison. Defense counsel now seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the basis that there are no nonfrivolous issues which can reasonably be pursued on appeal. Upon review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The record discloses that defendant, who was represented by counsel, entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement and relevant statutory requirements. Defendant also voluntar[832]*832ily waived his right to appeal as part of the plea agreement. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett, III, J.), rendered July 29, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

The record demonstrates that, pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree in satisfaction of, inter alia, a 13-count indictment and was sentenced to a term of IV2 to 3 years in prison. Defense counsel now seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the basis that there are no nonfrivolous issues which can reasonably be pursued on appeal. Upon review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The record discloses that defendant, who was represented by counsel, entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement and relevant statutory requirements. Defendant also voluntar[832]*832ily waived his right to appeal as part of the plea agreement. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 831, 714 N.Y.S.2d 702, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mochrie-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack