People v. Mitchell
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered April 30, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 3 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
[188]*188Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the court’s finding that the photographs in the photo array were sufficiently similar so that defendant was not singled out for identification (see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 336, cert denied 498 US 833). There was no violation of defendant’s limited right to counsel at his investigatory lineup (see Matter of Jamal C., 75 NY2d 893; compare People v LaClere, 76 NY2d 670). While the evidence established that the police were aware that defendant had an attorney on an unrelated case, that attorney did not enter the proceedings and neither defendant nor his mother ever made an unequivocal request that the attorney attend the lineup (see People v Hicks, 69 NY2d 969).
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. Concur — Buckley, J.P., Sullivan, Rubin, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
299 A.D.2d 187 (People v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.