People v. Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mitchell

269 A.D.2d 408, 702 N.Y.S.2d 568, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1175

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 408 (People v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mitchell, 269 A.D.2d 408, 702 N.Y.S.2d 568, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered November 13, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 25 years to life on the conviction of murder in the second degree and a determinate term of imprisonment of one year on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, to run concurrently with the other sentence.

[409]*409Ordered that the judgment is modified, by reducing the minimum term of imprisonment imposed for murder in the second degree to 20 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of depraved indifference murder is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Stahl, 53 NY2d 1048; People v Tallarine, 223 AD2d 738; People v Padro, 75 NY2d 820; People v Grossfeld, 216 AD2d 319). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

However, the sentence is excessive to the extent indicated. Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered November 13, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 25 years to life on the conviction of murder in the second degree and a determinate term of imprisonment of one year on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, to run concurrently with the other sentence.

[409]*409Ordered that the judgment is modified, by reducing the minimum term of imprisonment imposed for murder in the second degree to 20 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of depraved indifference murder is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Stahl, 53 NY2d 1048; People v Tallarine, 223 AD2d 738; People v Padro, 75 NY2d 820; People v Grossfeld, 216 AD2d 319). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

However, the sentence is excessive to the extent indicated. Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 408, 702 N.Y.S.2d 568, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mitchell-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack