People v. Miles
267 N.E.2d 882, 28 N.Y.2d 519, 319 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Miles. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 N.Y.2d 527 →
Opinion
Motion by defendant Howard, insofar as reargument is sought, dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.9 [b]).
Motion by defendant Howard, insofar as it seeks to amend the remittitur, denied upon the ground that the opinion of the Court of Appeals indicates that the constitutional arguments raised were passed upon (see 23 N Y 2d 527).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Miles, 267 N.E.2d 882, 28 N.Y.2d 519, 319 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1653 (N.Y. 1971).
267 N.E.2d 882 (People v. Miles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.