People v. Miles

292 N.E.2d 788, 31 N.Y.2d 918, 340 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 886
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 1972·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*919 Order reversed and the indictment dismissed in the following memorandum": The acts established, that defendant by threat of shooting compelled a father and son to drive him from Utica to Syracuse, do not bring the case within the terms of former Penal Law (§ 1250) to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he kidnapped the complainants with an intent they be ‘ ‘ confined or imprisoned” or “kept or detained”. The compulsion to provide transportation had no such relationship to detention as to make out a true kidnapping under the former statute (cf. People v. Levy, 15 N Y 2d 159; People v. Lombardi, 20 N Y 2d 266). The new Penal Law more precisely defines and limits the scope of kidnapping and related crimes (art. 135).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan and Gibson. Judges Scileppi and Jasen dissent and vote, to affirm. Taking no part: Judge Breitbl.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miles, 292 N.E.2d 788, 31 N.Y.2d 918, 340 N.Y.S.2d 647, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 886 (N.Y. 1972).

292 N.E.2d 788 (People v. Miles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. India
67 A.D.2d 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Stuckey
56 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People of State of New York v. Brinson
55 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Palmer
50 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)