People v. Middleton

292 A.D.2d 467, 738 N.Y.S.2d 882, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2531
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Middleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 A.D.2d 663

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered December 1, 1999, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The comments of the trial court at sentencing, taken as a whole, were a response to the defendant’s statements that he never intended to hurt anyone, and “reflect the fact that the [468]*468court was taking into consideration the nature of the crime, a legitimate factor in determining an appropriate sentence” (People v James, 216 AD2d 489; see, People v Anderson, 287 AD2d 574).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Middleton, 292 A.D.2d 467, 738 N.Y.S.2d 882, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 467 (People v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. James
216 A.D.2d 489 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Anderson
287 A.D.2d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)