People v. Middleton
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wade, J.), rendered August 6, 1996, as amended September 30, 1996 (Schneier, J.), convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal impersonation in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not err in denying his Batson challenges (Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79) to four peremptory challenges exercised by the prosecutor. The explanations given by the prosecutor were racially neutral (see, People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172, 173; People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101) and the defendant failed to establish that the explanations were pretextual (see, People v Scott, 267 AD2d 259; People v Walters, 248 AD2d 494).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
280 A.D.2d 495 (People v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.