People v. Middleton
This text of 14 A.D.2d 557 (People v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The claimed defects in the proceedings and in the testimony before [558]*558the Felony Court and the Grand Jury afford no basis for relief by way of coram nobis. (Cf. People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Close, 1 N Y 2d 258, 260-261; People v. Neeley, 4 A D 2d 1019; People v. Willett, 213 N. Y. 368, 375; People v. Manwaring, 3 A D 2d 952.) The purely eonelusory allegations in defendant’s affidavits that he was coerced into pleading guilty and that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, did not present any factual issue requiring a hearing (cf. People v. Smyth, 3 N Y 2d 184, 187-188; People v. Brown, 7 N Y 2d 359, 360). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.2d 557, 218 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-middleton-nyappdiv-1961.