People v. Middleton

14 A.D.2d 557, 218 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9679
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 5, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 A.D.2d 557 (People v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Middleton, 14 A.D.2d 557, 218 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

The claimed defects in the proceedings and in the testimony before [558]*558the Felony Court and the Grand Jury afford no basis for relief by way of coram nobis. (Cf. People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Close, 1 N Y 2d 258, 260-261; People v. Neeley, 4 A D 2d 1019; People v. Willett, 213 N. Y. 368, 375; People v. Manwaring, 3 A D 2d 952.) The purely eonelusory allegations in defendant’s affidavits that he was coerced into pleading guilty and that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, did not present any factual issue requiring a hearing (cf. People v. Smyth, 3 N Y 2d 184, 187-188; People v. Brown, 7 N Y 2d 359, 360). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Charles Lyon, Lyon Coram Auto Body, Inc., & L.A.L. Leasing
143 Misc. 2d 690 (New York County Courts, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 557, 218 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-middleton-nyappdiv-1961.