People v. Middleton

14 A.D.2d 557, 218 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9679
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 1961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The claimed defects in the proceedings and in the testimony before [558]*558the Felony Court and the Grand Jury afford no basis for relief by way of coram nobis. (Cf. People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Close, 1 N Y 2d 258, 260-261; People v. Neeley, 4 A D 2d 1019; People v. Willett, 213 N. Y. 368, 375; People v. Manwaring, 3 A D 2d 952.) The purely eonelusory allegations in defendant’s affidavits that he was coerced into pleading guilty and that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, did not present any factual issue requiring a hearing (cf. People v. Smyth, 3 N Y 2d 184, 187-188; People v. Brown, 7 N Y 2d 359, 360). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Middleton, 14 A.D.2d 557, 218 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

14 A.D.2d 557 (People v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Charles Lyon, Lyon Coram Auto Body, Inc., & L.A.L. Leasing
143 Misc. 2d 690 (New York County Courts, 1989)