People v. Messina

227 A.D.2d 312, 643 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6032
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered June 8, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and [313]*313was not against the weight of the evidence. Credibility determinations of the fact finder are entitled to great deference (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495), and should not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous (People v Corporan, 169 AD2d 643, lv denied 77 NY2d 959). Given the strong identification testimony of the People’s witnesses and defendant’s possession of the prerecorded buy money and additional drugs, the jury was justified in crediting the People’s witnesses and rejecting defendant’s claim that he was just a drug user whom the police conspired to arrest instead of the true seller. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Messina, 227 A.D.2d 312, 643 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 312 (People v. Messina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cohen
9 A.D.3d 71 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Holmes
232 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)