People v. Merced

177 A.D.2d 718

This text of 177 A.D.2d 718 (People v. Merced) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Merced, 177 A.D.2d 718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.), rendered June 16, 1989, convicting him of assault in the [719]*719second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial due to the court’s charge on consciousness of guilt has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 248-252). In any event, the court conveyed to the jury the correct legal standard regarding the evidence to be considered as consciousness of guilt (see, People v Whaley, 144 AD2d 510).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Whaley
144 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 A.D.2d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-merced-nyappdiv-1991.