People v. Menna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Menna

48 A.D.3d 484, 849 N.Y.S.2d 792

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 2008·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 4, 2006 (People v Menna, 28 AD3d 495 [2006]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 19, 2003.

[485] Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated April 4, 2006 (People v Menna, 28 AD3d 495 [2006]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 19, 2003.

[485] Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.

People v. Menna, 48 A.D.3d 484, 849 N.Y.S.2d 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

48 A.D.3d 484 (People v. Menna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related