People v. Menna

28 A.D.3d 495, 811 N.Y.S.2d 589
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 4, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered September 19, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[496] We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Menna, 28 A.D.3d 495, 811 N.Y.S.2d 589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 495 (People v. Menna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Menna
48 A.D.3d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)