People v. Menna
This text of 28 A.D.3d 495 (People v. Menna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered September 19, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[496]*496We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
The defendant has not raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 A.D.3d 495, 811 N.Y.S.2d 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-menna-nyappdiv-2006.