People v. Mendez

254 A.D.2d 752, 678 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mendez. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 162

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39) is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

We have examined the contentions raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mendez, 254 A.D.2d 752, 678 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Mendez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)