Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Mendez

People v. Mendez

254 A.D.2d 752, 678 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10447
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Mendez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mendez, 254 A.D.2d 752, 678 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10447 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39) is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

We have examined the contentions raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 752, 678 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mendez-nyappdiv-1998.