People v. Medinilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Medinilla

279 A.D.2d 891, 718 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 702

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 891 (People v. Medinilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Medinilla, 279 A.D.2d 891, 718 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered January 3, 2000, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Upon her plea of guilty of the crime of scheme to defraud in the first degree, defendant was sentenced to five years of probation and ordered to pay restitution. Less than one month later, a violation of probation report was filed alleging that defendant had been charged with a number of new crimes. Defendant entered a plea of guilty of violating a condition of her probation and she was ultimately sentenced to an indeterminate prison term of lYs to 4 years. Although defendant challenges the sentence as being unduly harsh and excessive, our review of the record reveals neither an abuse of discretion on the part of County Court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention (see, People v Corpin, 269 AD2d 622, lv denied 95 NY2d 795). Defendant has a substantial history of criminal conduct and an inability to abide by the conditions of probation. Her belated claim of mental illness and addiction is unsupported by the record despite the opportunity to substantiate the claim afforded by the court.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered January 3, 2000, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Upon her plea of guilty of the crime of scheme to defraud in the first degree, defendant was sentenced to five years of probation and ordered to pay restitution. Less than one month later, a violation of probation report was filed alleging that defendant had been charged with a number of new crimes. Defendant entered a plea of guilty of violating a condition of her probation and she was ultimately sentenced to an indeterminate prison term of lYs to 4 years. Although defendant challenges the sentence as being unduly harsh and excessive, our review of the record reveals neither an abuse of discretion on the part of County Court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting our intervention (see, People v Corpin, 269 AD2d 622, lv denied 95 NY2d 795). Defendant has a substantial history of criminal conduct and an inability to abide by the conditions of probation. Her belated claim of mental illness and addiction is unsupported by the record despite the opportunity to substantiate the claim afforded by the court.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 891, 718 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-medinilla-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack