People v. Medina

2023 NY Slip Op 01868
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 11, 2023
DocketSCI No. 3455/13 Appeal No. 18 Case No. 2018-2210
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 01868 (People v. Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Medina, 2023 NY Slip Op 01868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Medina (2023 NY Slip Op 01868)
People v Medina
2023 NY Slip Op 01868
Decided on April 11, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 11, 2023
Before: Kapnick, J.P., Kern, Friedman, Gesmer, Higgitt, JJ.

SCI No. 3455/13 Appeal No. 18 Case No. 2018-2210

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Juan Medina, Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, the Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah J. Sexton of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about January 19, 2018, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime against a 12-year-0ld child. There was nothing exceptional about defendant's response to sex offender and substance abuse treatment, or his disciplinary record (see e.g. People v Palmer, 166 AD3d 536 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 919 [2019]; People v Watson, 112 AD3d 501, 502-503 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 863 [2014]), and defendant has not shown that his age reduced his individual risk of reoffense to a degree that would warrant a departure.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 11, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Medina
2023 NY Slip Op 01868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 01868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-medina-nyappdiv-2023.