People v. Medina

73 A.D.3d 667, 900 N.Y.S.2d 871
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Medina. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 A.D.3d 1046

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), entered on or about December 13, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure from defendant’s presumptive risk [668]*668level (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Defendant’s point score was far above the threshold for a level three offender, and his successful completion of a treatment program did not warrant a downward departure, particularly in light of his very serious record of sex offenses against children. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Medina, 73 A.D.3d 667, 900 N.Y.S.2d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

73 A.D.3d 667 (People v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)