People v. Medina
57 A.D.3d 371, 868 N.Y.2d 533
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Medina. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 A.D.3d 240 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2008·Published
Opinion
The imposition of mandatory surcharges and fees by way of court documents, but without mention in the court’s oral pronouncement of sentence, was lawful (see People v Harris, 51 AD3d 523 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 935 [2008]). Moreover, in this case the court actually imposed these assessments at sentencing, but merely omitted the dollar amounts. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Gonzalez, Catterson, McGuire and Acosta, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Medina, 57 A.D.3d 371, 868 N.Y.2d 533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 371 (People v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Harris
51 A.D.3d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)