People v. McLean

229 A.D.2d 401, 644 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7585
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McLean. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D.2d 756

Opinion

—Appeal by [402]*402the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Angiollillo, J.), rendered December 7, 1994, convicting him of attempted robbery in the third degree, and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence is not legally sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Barrett, 166 AD2d 657, 658; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McLean, 229 A.D.2d 401, 644 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

229 A.D.2d 401 (People v. McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Barrett
166 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)