People v. McKinnon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McKinnon

168 A.D.2d 691, 563 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 A.D.2d 691 (People v. McKinnon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McKinnon, 168 A.D.2d 691, 563 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered December 20, 1988, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claims regarding the jury charge and the sufficiency of the evidence of "physical injury” are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Ford, 62 NY2d 275; see also, People v Ahmed, 66 NY2d 307; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 248-252). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to address these issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered December 20, 1988, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claims regarding the jury charge and the sufficiency of the evidence of "physical injury” are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Ford, 62 NY2d 275; see also, People v Ahmed, 66 NY2d 307; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 248-252). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to address these issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D.2d 691, 563 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mckinnon-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack