People v. McFadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McFadden

190 A.D.2d 1023

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 1023 (People v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McFadden, 190 A.D.2d 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Based upon our review of the record made at the nonjury trial, we conclude that the court’s verdict is supported by the testimony of Nesbitt and Smith, which is legally sufficient (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Further, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Based upon our review of the record made at the nonjury trial, we conclude that the court’s verdict is supported by the testimony of Nesbitt and Smith, which is legally sufficient (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Further, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcfadden-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack