People v. McColor

194 N.W.2d 99, 36 Mich. App. 455, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 19, 1971
DocketDocket 10329
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 194 N.W.2d 99 (People v. McColor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McColor, 194 N.W.2d 99, 36 Mich. App. 455, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinions

Quinn, J.

The errors relied on by defendant for appellate relief relate to prejudicial argument by the prosecuting attorney in summation to the jury, two instances of improper cross-examination by the prosecuting attorney and error in the jury instructions. None of the errors was preserved by objection at trial, and we are unable to find the “clear in[458]*458justice” required by People v. Qualls (1968), 9 Mich App 689, to overcome the “no objection — no error” rule.

Affirmed.

V. J. Brennan, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franklin v. State
366 A.2d 111 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1976)
People v. Small
242 N.W.2d 442 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Perez
239 N.W.2d 432 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
Sutton v. State
334 A.2d 126 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
People v. Bobo
212 N.W.2d 190 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Margaret Jones
210 N.W.2d 396 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)
People v. Henderson
209 N.W.2d 326 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)
People v. McColor
194 N.W.2d 99 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.W.2d 99, 36 Mich. App. 455, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccolor-michctapp-1971.