People v. McColor
This text of 194 N.W.2d 99 (People v. McColor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The errors relied on by defendant for appellate relief relate to prejudicial argument by the prosecuting attorney in summation to the jury, two instances of improper cross-examination by the prosecuting attorney and error in the jury instructions. None of the errors was preserved by objection at trial, and we are unable to find the “clear in[458]*458justice” required by People v. Qualls (1968), 9 Mich App 689, to overcome the “no objection — no error” rule.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 N.W.2d 99, 36 Mich. App. 455, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccolor-michctapp-1971.