People v. McCall
231 A.D.2d 859, 648 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh or severe does not survive the voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761, 763; People v Stewart, 222 AD2d 1111, lv denied 87 NY2d 977). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.—Attempted Arson, 3rd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. McCall, 231 A.D.2d 859, 648 N.Y.S.2d 418, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
231 A.D.2d 859 (People v. McCall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Eason
234 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Wallace
231 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)