People v. Stewart
222 A.D.2d 1111, 636 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14236
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh or severe does not survive the voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Beaner, 219 AD2d 827; People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092, 1093, lv denied 81 NY2d 1019). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Fricano, J. — Criminal Mischief, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Stewart, 222 A.D.2d 1111, 636 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14236 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
222 A.D.2d 1111 (People v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Chandler
244 A.D.2d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Costner
233 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. McCall
231 A.D.2d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Harrison
231 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)