People v. Stewart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stewart

220 A.D.2d 910, 649 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10177

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 220 A.D.2d 910 (People v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stewart, 220 A.D.2d 910, 649 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a [911]*911judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Zittell, J.), rendered September 19, 1994, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree.

We have reviewed the record and the brief submitted by defense counsel and agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised by defendant on appeal. Consequently, we find that the judgment should be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a [911]*911judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Zittell, J.), rendered September 19, 1994, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree.

We have reviewed the record and the brief submitted by defense counsel and agree that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised by defendant on appeal. Consequently, we find that the judgment should be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 910, 649 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stewart-nyappdiv-1995.