People v. May

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. May

34 Mich. App. 130

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1971

DocketDocket No. 10412

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 Mich. App. 130 (People v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. May, 34 Mich. App. 130 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant seeks reversal of his jury conviction and sentence for uttering and publishing a forged instrument, MCLA § 750.249 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.446). He contends reversible error was committed because the prosecuting attorney was not required to indorse and produce an alleged res gestae witness. The record indicates that this witness was known to defendant prior to [131]*131trial and defendant failed to move at trial for the indorsement of the witness. The question presented was not saved for review. People v. Love (1969), 18 Mich App 228, 231.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant seeks reversal of his jury conviction and sentence for uttering and publishing a forged instrument, MCLA § 750.249 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.446). He contends reversible error was committed because the prosecuting attorney was not required to indorse and produce an alleged res gestae witness. The record indicates that this witness was known to defendant prior to [131]*131trial and defendant failed to move at trial for the indorsement of the witness. The question presented was not saved for review. People v. Love (1969), 18 Mich App 228, 231.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Mich. App. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-may-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack