People v. Mattocks
This text of 15 A.D.3d 676 (People v. Mattocks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[677]*677Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.), entered November 20, 2003, which denied his postconviction motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing.
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing of specified evidence admitted at his trial since he failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the test results would have resulted in a verdict that was more favorable to him had the DNA test results been admitted into evidence at trial (see CPL 440.30 [1-a]; People v Leung, 3 AD3d 582 [2004]; People v Shenouda, 307 AD2d 938 [2003]; People v Pugh, 288 AD2d 634 [2001]; People v Kellar, 218 AD2d 406 [1996]). Florio, J.P, Adams, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.3d 676, 789 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mattocks-nyappdiv-2005.