People v. Johnson

223 A.D.3d 685, 201 N.Y.S.3d 245, 2024 NY Slip Op 00087
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2024
DocketInd. No. 74/22
StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D.3d 685 (People v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Johnson, 223 A.D.3d 685, 201 N.Y.S.3d 245, 2024 NY Slip Op 00087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Johnson (2024 NY Slip Op 00087)
People v Johnson
2024 NY Slip Op 00087
Decided on January 10, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 10, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
BARRY E. WARHIT
LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

2022-08849
(Ind. No. 74/22)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Antawon R. Johnson, appellant.


Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant.

Anthony P. Parisi, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Anna K. Diehn of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), rendered September 23, 2022, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v McGowan, 210 AD3d 909). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the requirement that the defendant waive his right to appeal his conviction was not improperly extracted from the defendant by the County Court, but, instead, was the result of a negotiated plea agreement between the People and the defendant (cf. People v Chaun Mu Fu, 186 AD3d 620, 621; People v Sutton, 184 AD3d 236, 240-241, 243).

Accordingly, the defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Rolling, 186 AD3d 1264; People v Ovalles, 161 AD3d 1107).

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHAMBERS, WARHIT and LOVE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Sutton
2020 NY Slip Op 3400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Chuan Mu Fu
2020 NY Slip Op 4486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Rolling
2020 NY Slip Op 04872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. McGowan
177 N.Y.S.3d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 A.D.3d 685, 201 N.Y.S.3d 245, 2024 NY Slip Op 00087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-johnson-nyappdiv-2024.