People v. Matthews

198 A.D.2d 849, 605 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11478
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: County Court erred in denying defendant’s challenge of a prospective juror for cause. Defendant used one of his peremptory challenges to excuse the prospective juror and thereafter exhausted his peremptory challenges. When questioned by defense counsel, the prospective juror stated that she was unsure that she could render an impartial verdict in a prosecution of drug-related offenses. In the absence of a showing that the juror could set aside her bias and render a verdict based solely on the evidence, the denial of the challenge for cause was error, and defendant’s conviction must be reversed (see, CPL 270.20 [2]; see also, People v Stewart, 185 AD2d 677).

In light of our reversal, we need not address defendant’s remaining contentions. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — Conspiracy, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Lawton, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Matthews, 198 A.D.2d 849, 605 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 849 (People v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Matthews
256 A.D.2d 1097 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Stokes
198 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)