People v. Mathis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mathis

241 A.D.2d 337, 659 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7047

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 337 (People v. Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mathis, 241 A.D.2d 337, 659 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J., at CPL 190.50 hearing; Paul Bookson, J., at plea and sentencing; William Wetzel, J., at resentencing), rendered September 26, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and resentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendants’ guilty plea forecloses appellate review of his claim that he was deprived of his right to testify before the Grand Jury (People v Mobayed, 234 AD2d 48; People v McConville, 188 AD2d 358, lv denied 81 NY2d 843). In any event, we find that the record supports the hearing court’s determination that defendant had consented to the withdrawal of his request to testify. Defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J., at CPL 190.50 hearing; Paul Bookson, J., at plea and sentencing; William Wetzel, J., at resentencing), rendered September 26, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and resentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendants’ guilty plea forecloses appellate review of his claim that he was deprived of his right to testify before the Grand Jury (People v Mobayed, 234 AD2d 48; People v McConville, 188 AD2d 358, lv denied 81 NY2d 843). In any event, we find that the record supports the hearing court’s determination that defendant had consented to the withdrawal of his request to testify. Defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D.2d 337, 659 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mathis-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack