People v. Mathis

228 A.D.2d 179, 644 N.Y.2d 703, 644 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6271
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

After the instant conviction upon jury verdict and imposition of sentence, defendant entered into a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of his right to appeal this judgment, in exchange for which he received a favorable sentence in connection with his guilty plea to the counts remaining in the indictment against him (as to which the jury at the subject trial had been unable to reach a unanimous verdict). We note that defendant’s current claims of error do not involve a surrender of rights barred by constitutional or statutory mandate or public policy. Thus, the waiver is valid and enforceable (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 7). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mathis, 228 A.D.2d 179, 644 N.Y.2d 703, 644 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6271 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 179 (People v. Mathis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Redden
246 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)