People v. Martinez

166 A.D.2d 925, 561 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 A.D.2d 699

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered and that defendant intelligently waived his rights (see, People [926]*926v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Rodriguez, 126 AD2d 580, lv denied 69 NY2d 954). Furthermore, the court did not abuse its discretion in summarily denying defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926; People v Rodriguez, supra).

Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the terms of his plea agreement. Although defendant does not have an extensive criminal history, the sentencing court properly noted the large amount of cocaine involved in the sale transaction. Thus, the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of seven years to life. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.—criminal sale of controlled substance, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martinez, 166 A.D.2d 925, 561 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

166 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tinsley
324 N.E.2d 544 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Rodriguez
126 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)