People v. Martinez

144 A.D.2d 978, 535 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14481
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martinez. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 A.D.2d 505

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s claim that the court abused its discretion in refusing to impose "shock” probation as a sentence is without merit. The court determined that defendant’s lengthy arrest record, history of prior convictions and commission of the subject crime while on probation warranted the imposition of an indeterminate term of imprisonment. Under the circumstances, we see no reason to disturb the court’s exercise of discretion.

The remaining issues raised by the defendant were not preserved for our review and do not warrant the exercise of our discretion in the interests of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Reed, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Martinez, 144 A.D.2d 978, 535 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

144 A.D.2d 978 (People v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.