People v. Martin

181 N.Y.S.3d 927, 2023 NY Slip Op 00763
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 2023
Docket69 KA 19-01413
StatusPublished

This text of 181 N.Y.S.3d 927 (People v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Martin, 181 N.Y.S.3d 927, 2023 NY Slip Op 00763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Martin (2023 NY Slip Op 00763)
People v Martin
2023 NY Slip Op 00763
Decided on February 10, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 10, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND OGDEN, JJ.

69 KA 19-01413

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

TREVOR MARTIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SUSAN R. HUTCHISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (JERRY MARTI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered May 23, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Gordon, 191 AD3d 1367, 1368 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 36 NY3d 1120 [2021]; People v Clark, 191 AD3d 1485, 1485 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 954 [2021]). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: February 10, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gordon
2021 NY Slip Op 00746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 N.Y.S.3d 927, 2023 NY Slip Op 00763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martin-nyappdiv-2023.