People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

People v. Martin

174 P. 91, 37 Cal. App. 213, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 274

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 13, 1918

DocketCrim. No. 710.

StatusPublished

This text of 174 P. 91 (People v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Martin, 174 P. 91, 37 Cal. App. 213, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 274 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

In this case the appellant failed to file a brief in support of his appeal, or to appear before the court on the date set for the argument thereof, and the appeal might properly have been dismissed upon that ground. We have, *Page 214 however, carefully examined the record, and find that there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment, that the court fairly instructed the jury, and that there were no errors in the admission or rejection of evidence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and order be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this case the appellant failed to file a brief in support of his appeal, or to appear before the court on the date set for the argument thereof, and the appeal might properly have been dismissed upon that ground. We have, *Page 214 however, carefully examined the record, and find that there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment, that the court fairly instructed the jury, and that there were no errors in the admission or rejection of evidence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and order be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 P. 91, 37 Cal. App. 213, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-martin-calctapp-1918.