People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

People v. Martin

37 Cal. App. 213

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Cal. App. 45 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided May 13, 1918·No. Crim. No. 710·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

In this case the appellant failed to file a brief in support of his appeal, or to appear before the court on the date set for the argument thereof, and the appeal might properly have been dismissed upon that ground. We have, [214]*214however, carefully examined the record, and find that there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment, that the court fairly instructed the jury, and that there were no errors in the admission or rejection of evidence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and order be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

In this case the appellant failed to file a brief in support of his appeal, or to appear before the court on the date set for the argument thereof, and the appeal might properly have been dismissed upon that ground. We have, [214]*214however, carefully examined the record, and find that there was sufficient evidence to support the judgment, that the court fairly instructed the jury, and that there were no errors in the admission or rejection of evidence.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment and order be affirmed.

People v. Martin, 37 Cal. App. 213 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

37 Cal. App. 213 (People v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.