People v. Marshall

187 A.D.2d 675, 591 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13194
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Marshall. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D.2d 463

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from [676]*676two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), both rendered May 21, 1990, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 180/90 and assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 181/90, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

As the defendant did not move to withdraw his guilty pleas or challenge their validity prior to sentencing, he has not preserved for appellate review the claim that the plea allocutions were defective (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Pierce, 185 AD2d 1000). In any event, upon our review of the minutes of the plea proceedings, we find that the defendant’s pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, and that the allocutions were factually sufficient (see, People v Lopez, supra, at 666). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marshall, 187 A.D.2d 675, 591 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

187 A.D.2d 675 (People v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Pierce
185 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)