People v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Marcus

159 A.D.2d 1016, 555 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3342

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 1016 (People v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Marcus, 159 A.D.2d 1016, 555 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that defendant’s attorney provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Further, the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — assault, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that defendant’s attorney provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Further, the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — assault, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 1016, 555 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marcus-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack