People v. Marcus
159 A.D.2d 1016, 555 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3342
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Marcus. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 A.D.2d 723 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that defendant’s attorney provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Further, the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305-306). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — assault, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Marcus, 159 A.D.2d 1016, 555 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
159 A.D.2d 1016 (People v. Marcus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)