People v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Marcus

148 A.D.2d 992, 540 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 148 A.D.2d 992 (People v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Marcus, 148 A.D.2d 992, 540 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no merit to defendant’s claim that certain equivocal remarks, made by Justice Kennedy at the conclusion of a pretrial suppression hearing conducted over a month prior to entry of defendant’s guilty plea, were coercive and rendered his subsequent guilty plea before Judge Celli involuntary as a matter of law. At the plea proceedings, defendant, who was represented by counsel, stated on the record that he had discussed the proposed plea agreement with his attorney, gave a factual basis for his plea, and advised the court that his plea was made voluntarily and without any coercion or threat. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — burglary, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no merit to defendant’s claim that certain equivocal remarks, made by Justice Kennedy at the conclusion of a pretrial suppression hearing conducted over a month prior to entry of defendant’s guilty plea, were coercive and rendered his subsequent guilty plea before Judge Celli involuntary as a matter of law. At the plea proceedings, defendant, who was represented by counsel, stated on the record that he had discussed the proposed plea agreement with his attorney, gave a factual basis for his plea, and advised the court that his plea was made voluntarily and without any coercion or threat. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — burglary, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 A.D.2d 992, 540 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marcus-nyappdiv-1989.