People v. Marcus

148 A.D.2d 992, 540 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Marcus. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 A.D.2d 723

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no merit to defendant’s claim that certain equivocal remarks, made by Justice Kennedy at the conclusion of a pretrial suppression hearing conducted over a month prior to entry of defendant’s guilty plea, were coercive and rendered his subsequent guilty plea before Judge Celli involuntary as a matter of law. At the plea proceedings, defendant, who was represented by counsel, stated on the record that he had discussed the proposed plea agreement with his attorney, gave a factual basis for his plea, and advised the court that his plea was made voluntarily and without any coercion or threat. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — burglary, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marcus, 148 A.D.2d 992, 540 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

148 A.D.2d 992 (People v. Marcus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.