People v. Mannina
This text of 89 A.D.3d 1038 (People v. Mannina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s contention that the County Court improperly sentenced him upon his violation of a condition of his probation [1039]*1039without ordering an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gambichler, 25 AD3d 722, 723 [2006]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282 [1994]; cf. People v Pons, 134 AD2d 378, 378-379 [1987]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Skelos, J.P, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 1038, 933 N.Y.2d 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mannina-nyappdiv-2011.