People v. Gledhill
This text of 91 A.D.3d 886 (People v. Gledhill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s contention that the County Court improperly sentenced her without obtaining an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Mannina, 89 AD3d 1038 [2011]; People v Thompson, 65 AD3d 1390 [2009]; People v Grzywaczewski, 61 AD3d 699, 700 [2009]; People v Ruffino, 52 AD3d 624, 625 [2008]; People v Ramirez, 29 AD3d 1022 [2006]) and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282-283 [1994]; People v Mannina, 89 AD3d 1038 [2011]; People v Ruff, 50 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2008]).
The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.E, Roman, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.3d 886, 936 N.Y.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gledhill-nyappdiv-2012.