People v. Gledhill

91 A.D.3d 886, 936 N.Y.2d 916

Opinion

The defendant’s contention that the County Court improperly sentenced her without obtaining an updated presentence report is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Mannina, 89 AD3d 1038 [2011]; People v Thompson, 65 AD3d 1390 [2009]; People v Grzywaczewski, 61 AD3d 699, 700 [2009]; People v Ruffino, 52 AD3d 624, 625 [2008]; People v Ramirez, 29 AD3d 1022 [2006]) and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282-283 [1994]; People v Mannina, 89 AD3d 1038 [2011]; People v Ruff, 50 AD3d 1167, 1168 [2008]).

The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.E, Roman, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.