People v. Mancini
This text of 239 A.D.2d 436 (People v. Mancini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered April 7, 1995, convicting him of attempted escape in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In sentencing the defendant, the County Court properly considered the.defendant’s statement made to a State Investigator even though the statement had been suppressed as evidence obtained in violation of Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436; see, People v Williams, 164 AD2d 1, 6, mod 79 NY2d 281, 288; People v Estenson, 101 AD2d 687; People v Wright, 104 Misc 2d 911, 920-925). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D.2d 436, 658 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mancini-nyappdiv-1997.