People v. Majestic

270 A.D.2d 884, 705 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3530
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 29, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D.2d 884 (People v. Majestic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Majestic, 270 A.D.2d 884, 705 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in imposing a 5% surcharge on the restitution ordered for funds expended for the purchase of controlled substances from defendant (see, Penal Law § 60.27 [9]). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating that surcharge. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Genesee County Court, Noonan, J. — Attempted Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
272 A.D.2d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D.2d 884, 705 N.Y.S.2d 922, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-majestic-nyappdiv-2000.